I have and can prove The Republic of Texas has been illegally, criminally and militarily occupied since 1865 and that the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ is an illegal sub corporation of the occupying ‘UNITED STATES’ CORPORATION.
The ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ is the occupation administrative arm of the Occupation of the ‘UNITED STATES” CORPORATION.
When the Scamdemic
was perpetrated on humanity by the Rothschilds
‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’ from the Red Russian Khazarian Occupation Guvnor
played the “COVID-19” game, forcing non medical communistic penal code “lock downs” on Texicans,
Useless as teats on a boar hog to stop the transmission of ANY virus, much less an imaginary one dust masking,
and harassment of folks who did not volunteer to take a Rothschild witch’s brew voodoo assisted suicide Euthanasia
Non Vaccine killer jab for a non existent virus.
“THE STATE OF TEXAS’ and all the treasonous scalawags, yankee carpetbaggers, Mexico and Israel Firsters serving the occupation sub corporation against Texicans were up to their eyeballs in the crimes violating the 1947 Nuremberg code and deserve and by law should be given fair trials and fair hangings for their crimes against Texicans perpetrating this massive fraud with resulted in many many family businesses being shut down, savings accounts wiped out, jobs lost, children damaged by school lockdowns, forced masking in addition to those already dead from the Killer Jabs as well as those who are the walking dead just waiting for that Killer Jab induced heart attack, stroke or Turbo Cancer to finish the job.
below you will see the writings of a man who has been at the forefront of proving the fraud from the beginning of the Scamdemic.
‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’ is now using Smoke and Mirrors suing Pfizer to try to distance themselves from the hangman’s noose as more and more proof is coming out of the millions of deaths which have happened already, the fraud of the whole scamdemic.
He has offered to prove the case against Pfizer, but no one from ‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’ wants to talk to him.
Self preservation I imagine.
‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’ wants the illusion of fighting for Texicans while continuing to sell Texicans asses out to their Rothschild masters.
‘The Ole Dog!Some assbag in Texas AG Paxton’s office hasn’t responded to my offer’
So here it is. YOU, dear reader, can send it to Paxton’s office. Find an email address that looks productive and get busy.
Paxton’s lawsuit focuses on the ineffectiveness of the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
I proved that case a long time ago.
I’ve posted the key article several times.
The New York Times, in an op-ed, originally made the case. I took off from the op-ed and explained exactly how Pfizer sank its own ship, and why.
In my email to Paxton’s office, I stated I’d need to speak with a person familiar with both the lawsuit and with clinical trials of vaccines. After that conversation, I would send the evidence.
Nothing came back.
Who’s pulling down a paycheck over there for being an idiot?
All right, here we go. Here’s the real Pfizer story:
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know” (here):
If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?
The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.
But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.
According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.
THE CLINICAL TRIALS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO SHOW THE VACCINE COULD PREVENT SERIOUS ILLNESS. OR HOSPITALIZATION. OR DEATH.
To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
And I could stop this article right here and walk away. Done. Finished. Nothing more need be said.
And you the reader could walk away. OK, done. The clinical trials of the vaccine were never intended to prevent serious illness of any kind. Never intended to prevent hospitalizations or deaths. End of story.
Goodbye. Forget the vaccine. Why would anyone want to take it?
But if you want to know WHY the clinical trials were designed this way, and HOW the con was played, and why it was actually necessary to design the clinical trials to be useless, read on.
Again, make sure you understand the clinical trials of the RNA vaccines were only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” (cough, fever, chills).
THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS THOSE CASES.
Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.
The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…
Now pay close attention. Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups—those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers during the clinical trial.
Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19 (cough, chills, fever), and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.
The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.”
The outcomes for ONLY 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.”
And again, how is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:
In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19—for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test—would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.
“So, Doctor, the magic number is 150 ‘who cares’ mild cases? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”
“And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no vaccine is needed.”
“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”
“Yes, that’s right.”
“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”
“I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”