A good thing about getting old is you personally witnessed a lot of the crooked things politicians and city hall did they hope everyone will forget about.
Years back San Antonio’s water supply was pristine.
Limestone filtered water right out of the Edwards aquifer.
Then the whored out bottom feeder teat hangers at San Antonio City Hall decided San Antonio Children should be dumbed down by being forced to drink water mixed with the industrial byproduct of smelting aluminum or making chemical fertilizer called fluoride, a waste product identified as a Hazardous Waste by even the corrupt FDA.
The bribe taking political whores
at San Antonio City Hall forced a referendum on adulterating San Antonio’s water supply with this cancer and brittle bone causing Industrial Hazardous Waste which makes children brain damaged stupid to see if the voters would approve this crime against San Antonio’s people.
The voters shot it down.
Next election cycle the whored out bribe taking bottom feeder teat hanger political whores again forced the question on the ballot.
Again the people of San Antonio shot it down.
Before the next election cycle, the whores of city hall used taxpayer funds to buy ad spots on radio, television and newspapers to tell whopper lies about the hazardous waste product’s “benefits” while lying their asses off denying scientific facts of it’s harms to humans.
This time they got it passed.
Ever since food has been taken out of little children’s mouths via taxes to pay to dump a hazardous waste byproduct into the water supply which causes cancer, brittle bones, makes kids stupid and DON’T HELP STOP CAVITIES!
So you have to ask yourself, do the bribes to make war on San Antonio’s children pass from politician to politician with each new election along with the office where the new political whores make war on San Antonio’s people?
Seems to me the smart thing to do would be stop paying industrial giants to dispose of their waste byproducts for them by forcing San Antonio’s children to drink it, and lower the high taxes stealing food from San Antonio’s children’s mouths which the savings.
The Ole Dog!
‘San Antonio City Hall Wants To Make Your Kids Brain Damaged-US Government Releases Censored Documents Detailing Fluoride’s Impact On Childhood IQ’
The U.S. government has been forced to release a controversial draft review that confirms previous studies which found exposure to fluoride at high levels can reduce IQ in children.
The U.S. National Toxicology Program has released a long-delayed controversial review of the science behind claims that fluoride reduces IQ in children. The NTP review from May 2022 confirms the findings of two earlier drafts from 2019 and 2020 which concluded that prenatal and early life exposure to fluoride can reduce IQ.
The NTP review was made public on Wednesday per an agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), as part of an ongoing lawsuit under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The FAN and plaintiffs are attempting to prove that fluoride is a neurotoxin and should be regulated or banned under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
The NTP review was released with a table of contents detailing the more than 1500 pages of documents. Other documents include comments from external peer-reviewers and internal departments within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as well as the NTP scientists responses.
The summary of the May 2022 version of the NTP monograph states that,
“this review finds, with moderate confidence, that higher fluoride exposure isconsistently associated with lower IQ in children. More studies are needed to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children’s IQ.”
Although the release of the NTP review is a positive development for the Fluoride Action Network and plaintiffs, FAN told The Last American Vagabond, “we have very little confidence NTP will ever officially release the monograph as a final report. HHS has now taken over the process, and controls the show.”
The release of the internal documents offers a rare window into deliberations which take place behind the closed doors of the U.S. government’s scientific community. These discussions highlight how the NTP scientists have consistently defended their findings while also seeking to address the concerns of the various agencies which have reviewed their work multiple times.