— Because the state claims the ability to tell you what you can and cannot do with your own property, often times, we see utterly ridiculous government overreach for simple issues like tall grass.
In the land of the free, people have faced insane fines, been arrested, and have even had the state attempt to steal their entire home — over the length of their grass. Never, however, have we seen someone die because of it — until now.
This week, Austin police attempted to serve a warrant to man whose grass was too long. It resulted in a standoff, shots fired, a house fire, and that man’s death.
According to police, code enforcers showed up to his residence at 9:16 a.m. on Wednesday to serve the nuisance warrant over his tall grass. A grass-cutting crew was with the government agents and they were prepared to forcibly mow the man’s grass.
But he never came to the door.
After their attempts to contact the man failed, city workers began mowing his grass. An hour later, shots rang out from inside his home.
“And they immediately backed off. They got all of the staff that was working on the house to safety and and a SWAT call was initiated for a barricaded subject,” Austin Police Chief Joseph Chacon said.
An area lockdown ensued after officers and a crisis negotiator attempted unsuccessfully to get the man to exit peacefully. An hours-long standoff ensued after their attempts failed.
“SWAT spent the next several hours trying to negotiate with the individual to just simply come out of the house,” Chacon said.
But the man did not come out. Instead, according to police, he began firing at officers so they sent in a SWAT robot.
At about 3 p.m., the resident started shooting at officers again. “And because of that immediate threat … they made entry using a robot,” Chacon said.
According to police, the robot determined that the man had started a fire inside but attempts to have him exit remained unsuccessful.
Finally, after flames began to engulf the home, according to police, the man came out of the garage “with weapons in his hand,” and “at that time, a SWAT officer shot and struck the resident who went down with a gunshot wound,” Chacon said.
OK-Ok but the “witch” burning, little Southern child gang raping till death yankee war criminals illegally invaded the South, Holocausted half a million Southerners, stole everything to free slaves.
OK-Ok, but the Japanese pulled a sneak attack on Pearl Harbor Holocausting 3,000 Americans and NO ONE knew it was coming!
Not even the Commie FDR who backed them into a corner with economic sanctions so they would attack and FDR could drag America into the war he promised Americans he would keep them out of to get re-elected.
Ok-Ok, but American General George S Patton who was trying to stop the USA from turning Eastern Europe over to red Russian communism and stop the preplanned Cold War was killed in a slow speed car wreak!
Ok-Ok, but 12 Arabs hijacked some planes and brought down three steel buildings in New York with two planes Holocausting 3,000 Americans on 11 September 2001!
“Takes a thousand props to hold up a lie but the truth will stand alone.”
The Ole Dog!
There has been major pushback against a Texas state education official who said that if schools are adhering to a new state law that mandates teaching alternative points of view on controversial issues having a course and a book on the holocaust, for example, would suggest providing material that reflects other interpretations of that historical event. The comment came from a Texas school district administrator named Gina Peddy in the Carrollton Independent School District in Southlake, which is in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, who was in a training session explaining to teachers her directive regarding which books can be available in classroom libraries. She told teachers that if they have books about the Holocaust in their classrooms, they should also have books that offer “opposing” or “other” viewpoints on the subject.
Reportedly a staff member who was present secretly made an audio recording of the training session which was then shared with NBC News, which broke the story.
The Texas law was and is intended to lessen the impact of the current “woke” campaign by progressive educators to rewrite American and international history to reflect the dark side, notably by emphasizing issues like slavery and oppression of minorities. Texas legislators insist, not unreasonably, that presenting an essentially negative view of American history as envisioned by Critical Race Theory (CRT) must be balanced by having a curriculum that also includes discussion of the many positive achievements of the United States of America. In the recording, Peddy, the school district’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, told the teachers that the new law applies to any “widely debated and currently controversial” issues. She was quoted as saying “And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust, that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.”
Predictably, on such a hot wire issue Peddy has had little or no support from her peers either locally or in the education establishment. The school district Superintendent Lane Ledbetter posted on Facebook an “apology regarding the online article and news story.” He said Peddy’s comments were “in no way to convey that the Holocaust was anything less than a terrible event in history. Additionally, we recognize there are not two sides of the Holocaust. We also understand this bill does not require an opposing viewpoint on historical facts.”
Clay Robison, a spokesman for the Texas State Teachers Association, responded “We find it reprehensible for an educator to require a Holocaust denier to get equal treatment with the facts of history. That’s absurd. It’s worse than absurd. And this law does not require it.” Republican state Senator Bryan Hughes, who wrote the bill that became the law, denied that anyone should come up with alternative views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to remove books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust.
Jews in Peddy’s school district and elsewhere in both Texas and nationally have inevitably also risen to the bait, denouncing any attempt made to challenge what they view as an issue fundamental to their understanding of their place in the world and in history. One Jewish former student Jake Berman asserted that “The facts are that there are not two sides of the Holocaust. The Nazis systematically killed millions of people.”
Ledbetter, Robison and Hughes should perhaps consider that they are suggesting that their new law should only apply on “controversial” racial issues, not on other historical developments and it is curious that educated people should consider a multi-faceted transnational historical event that has inter alia a highly politicized context a “fact.” The holocaust narrative in and of itself is the creation of men and women after the fact with an agenda to justify the creation and support for the State of Israel and should be subject to the same inquiry as any other facet of the Second World War and what came after.
The tale of “the holocaust” is essentially a contrived bit of history that serves a political objective wrapped up in what purports to be a powerful statement regarding man’s inhumanity to man. Jewish groups generally speaking consider the standard narrative with its highly questionable six million dead, gas chambers, extermination camps, and soap made from body fat to be something like sacred ground, with its memorialization of the uniqueness of Jewish suffering. Serious scholars who have actually looked at the narrative and the numbers and sequences of events are not surprisingly skeptical of many of the details.
As a first step, it is helpful to look at controversial Professor Norman Finkelstein’s carefully documented book The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. Finkelstein, to be sure, believes there was something like a genocide of European Jews and even lost some family members due to it. He does not, however, necessarily believe many of the details provided by the standard narrative and official promoters of that story to include the numerous holocaust museums. In his view, powerful interests have hijacked “the Holocaust,” and use it to further their own objectives. He wrote “Organized Jewry has exploited the Nazi holocaust to deflect criticism of Israel’s and its own indefensible policies. Nazi genocide has been used to justify criminal policies of the Israeli state and US support for these policies.”
And there is also a money angle, as there often is. Per Finkelstein, Jewish organizations in the US have also exploited the situation of the dwindling number of aging holocaust survivors to extort “staggering sums of money from the rest of the world. This is not done not for the benefit of needy survivors but for the financial advantage of these organizations.”
SAN ANTONIO – San Antonio police officers accused of violating the department’s body-worn camera policy are rarely suspended, a months-long investigation by the KSAT 12 Defenders found.
During the three-year period from June 2018 to June 2021, SAPD officials reviewed 256 allegations of body-worn camera infractions. In 42 of those cases, slightly over 16 percent, was an officer suspended one day or longer, records obtained from the department show.
During those three years, SAPD officers recorded more than 5.6 million videos. SAPD policy requires officers to activate the camera when they are investigating and interacting with the public.Generally, the infractions center around an officer failing to turn on the camera or muting it at an inappropriate time. Allegations can be lodged internally by SAPD staff who review body-worn camera footage or from members of the public.
JFK was going to stop the Rothschilds in occupied Palestine from getting illegal Nuclear weapons, which they now have an estimated 300 of, which they threaten to blow the world up with, if they don’t get their way.Whats baffling about it?
Whats baffling about it?
USA/DC is Israel’s bitch.
ISRAEL IS ROTHSCHILD’S USEFUL IDIOT BITCH.
HANDS Biden is Israel’s Bitch, thus a Rothschild’s Bitch.
JFK was not the first American leader murdered by the Rothschilds for standing up for America against Rothschild’s zionism/Communism Twins.
Nor was he the last.
American General George S Patton murdered by USA & Communist Russia (Rothschilds) for trying to stop the pre-planned Cold War and America’s take over by the Communist/zionist twins of evil.-1945
James Forrestal,-last Cabinet-level United States Secretary of the Navy and the first United States Secretary of Defense.
Murdered by the USA (Ratschilds) for opposing the formation of an Israel State (Rothschilds private fiefdom in the Middle East) as bad for America.-1949.
Joe McCarthy-WW 2 hero, US Senator who was exposing the level of Communist/Zionist infiltration of the DC government and the US military.
He checked into a Navy hospital with a knee problem and was dead from a bacterial hepatitis three days later.
The communist/zionist controlling the US government and MSM portrayed him as a drunk who died of sorosis of the liver.
The type hepatitis he died from has nothing to do with drinking or sorosis of the liver.
And he did not have hepatitis when he checked into the same navy hospital Forrestal was thrown out a window of, and which would do the cover up “autopsy” of JFK’s murder.
JFK, murdered for standing up for America and apposing Israel (Rothschilds)-1963.
The faked pandemic, communist lockdowns, forced masking and DC pushing killer clot shot jabs on Americans is just a continuation of a long war against humanity by some very evil sons of slimy cunt bitches.
The Ole Dog!
Thanks to President Joe Biden, JFK assassination records set to be released this year will be going back and to the archives. Back and to the archives. Back and to the archives….
In a statement on Friday, the White House announced that long-classified documents regarding the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy “shall be withheld from full public disclosure” until Dec. 15, 2022 — over 59 years after Kennedy was killed in Dallas, Texas.
According to CBS News, despite federal law which mandates all records on the event “should be eventually disclosed to enable the public to become fully informed about the history surrounding the assassination,” Biden said the federal archivist needs one more year to make appropriate redactions to minimize “identifiable harm.”
While former President Donald Trump released several thousand pages of files under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, he held back others, citing national security concerns.
According to a Friday statement from Biden, the federal government has been reviewing these redactions since 2018. They apparently need more time, because this is the federal government under the Biden administration and did we, like, expect them to do their job in an expedient manner?
The statement noted the act allowed a postponement of record release when it “remains necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.”
It went on to say that the national archivist at the National Archives and Records Administration said “unfortunately, the pandemic has had a significant impact on the agencies” and that NARA “require[s] additional time to engage with the agencies and to conduct research within the larger collection to maximize the amount of information released.”
The archivist added that “making these decisions is a matter that requires a professional, scholarly, and orderly process; not decisions or releases made in haste” and recommended Biden “temporarily certify the continued withholding of all of the information certified in 2018” and “direct two public releases of the information that has” eventually “been determined to be appropriate for release to the public.”
We’re already a good four years past the deadline from the federal government to turn in the assignment, so to speak. The JFK Act is clear: “Each assassination record shall be publicly disclosed in full, and available in the Collection no later than the date that is 25 years after the date of enactment of this Act.”
The only exceptions are, of course, if the records cause “identifiable harm” and that harm is “of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.” Well, whaddya know …
Just When Social Security Was About To Collapse A Half Million American Retirees Died Prematurely Of COVID-19. That Saves ~$48.5 Billion. Was This All Pre-Planned?
Elitist Bank Of International Settlements Issues Digital Currencies Guide But Doesn’t Instruct How To Correct Ongoing Central Bank Public Robbery.
The game is as old as the Roman Empire. The Roman Emperor was to be worshiped. He ruled by executive orders. Conquer other lands, then issue a new currency, in this case a silver denarius, said to be worth a day’s wages at the time, and force the conquered to pay homage (taxes) and you control and subjugate the people. Then shave silver off the edges of the silver coins, something called debasement, akin to inflation with modern paper dollars. Eventually the silver content of a denarius fell to zero. Shrewd Roman soldiers reportedly refused to accept debased silver coins as payment for their services.
So readers can roughly assess the rate of inflation over the centuries, the Bible says Jesus fed bread to 5000 which would have cost ~200 denarii or a half-year’s pay at the time. A denarius would be worth ~$2.60 today. A $1 slider (small hamburger) would cost $5000 or 1,923 denarii to feed those five-thousand today.
Back in the day, a Roman denarius could buy a male slave (500 denarii), a female slave (2,000-6,000 denarii) or an apartment (48-288 denarii/year).
Today, overspending world economies based upon fiat currency (unsecured paper money) have printed themselves out of insolvency at the expense of their tax payers by using inflation (printing more paper and electronic money which dilutes the value of existing money and results in less purchasing power) to keep the ship of state from sinking financially.
As Matthew Piepenburg says: “there’s no better way to get themselves (the central bank) out of a $30T public debt hole of their own digging than by sucker-punching the masses with deliberate inflation to pay off their own debt binge with increasingly inflation-debased dollars.”
A $1437 Social Security check should be $7611!
If you had to increase Social Security checks pegged to the real rate of inflation (not the published rate of inflation), the average $321 Social Security check in 1980 would be $7611 today (ShadowStats.com inflation calculator), when in fact the average SS check today is only $1437.
According to ShadowStats.com the real current rate of inflation is 13%, not the central bank’s target rate of 2%. You get the picture. Today’s money is not worth yesterday’s money.
Meanwhile, the price of a 1-ounce gold coin is ~$1800 today when adjusted for inflation from $850 in 1980 to the present, it would be $21,900. Somebody is manipulating precious metals prices downward so there is no competition for the increasingly worthless paper money.
Hidden erosion of wealth
Naïve Americans check their savings account and it has about the same amount of money in it from year to year, interest rates being less than 1%. Most Americans don’t realize the value of their money is being eroded and doesn’t have the same purchasing power it once did.
The people will never notice that the good money they put into the system was paid back in weak money when taken out decades later. This is public robbery of the highest order.
Velocity of money at an all-time low
$5.4 trillion has been added to the money supply as financial stimulus during the Covid crisis. Because of inflation, new money put into the system has to be spent before it becomes worthless over time. The only thing keeping a lid on inflation is that US consumers are saving or paying down credit card bills, not spending. The velocity of money (how fast money is spent) is at an all-time low. Over two trillion dollars of stimulus money ended up in the hands of bankers because recipients parked it.
If consumers don’t spend, inflation is stalled
Shortages of goods due to supply chain problems may have a back-side blessing. Consumers can’t spend as much money on Christmas gifts this year due to a backup of foreign-made goods at ports of entry. If money isn’t spent, retailers will have to hold down prices. Predicted inflation will stall out. At this moment, the public is dropping a monkey wrench into the government’s planned inflation to coerce adoption of digital currency. Wouldn’t you know– the damn peons aren’t cooperating according to plan J.
There are no life boats: everyone will go down with a sinking ship
There is no account at Social Security with your name on it that has money in it. Everyone will go down with the ship when the river of new money dries up and can’t prop up the stock market bubble any longer. Then the stock market tumbles, people panic and hoard stuff, inflation runs wild and the dollar is toast. That moment is now upon us. Ironically, the only thing holding up the predicted inflation is that the stimulus money must be spent for run-away inflation to occur.
This inevitable financial and monetary crisis appears to be created to force Americans to accept a new digital currency, which is a social control mechanism, not a remedy to what ails the economy or halts erosion in the value of the dollar.
Adoption of digital currency is like buying a new car that can go faster (rapid transactions) and is bought at a bargain price (reduced handling fees), but you can’t drive the car when and where you want to drive the car (forbidden to make certain purchases).
How a nation gets away with inflation
A nation can run with this inflationary scheme as long as it has a generation of new young workers paying into the Social Security system that won’t collect till years later. But when the Baby Boomers, born 1946-1964, hit their retirement years beginning in 2011, the scheme began to fall apart.
Today the US has 2.9 worker paychecks with FICA deductions for future Medicare and Social Security for every retiree receiving a Social Security check. In 1945 when early Baby Boomers were being born, there were 41.9 workers contributing to Social Security per retiree.
The Social Security Trust Fund, save for FICA payroll deductions every two weeks, cannot supply sufficient funds to pay retirees. Part of the money now comes out of the general fund.
To reiterate, today’s inflated (less valuable) dollars are being used to pay Social Security checks today as FICA deductions are taken out of paychecks, but part of this financial burden must now come out of the general fund which only remains solvent because of borrowing. But that well has dried up too.
No longer does Japan or China buy US Treasury Notes (IOUs) because of the remote chance they will ever be paid back, our national debt (what we owe others) being $28 trillion. The US cannot pay down its own credit card bill. So now the US Treasury Department must print money out of thin air instead of borrow it from overseas sources.
Robots and unemployment
Just imagine the problem should robots begin to take the place of wage earners for menial repetitive jobs. A 24-hour robot works three human shifts, with no vacations, sick days, or weekends. Each robot replaces ~6.6 jobs. Robots don’t receive paychecks to make FICA payroll deductions for Medicare and Social Security.
By 2025 robots could take the place of 2 million jobs lost during the Covid pandemic. Already an estimated 42% of 40 million jobs lost at the peak of the pandemic are gone forever. The point being, even fewer contributions are being made to the Social Security Trust Fund.
While robotization presents challenges, the US could finally stop exporting all its jobs overseas. Robots are cheaper than overseas labor. The $500 billion imbalance in international trade between the US and China could be reduced via robotization without imposing trade tariffs.
What a coincidence
Suddenly, seemingly out of nowhere (we know better), a man-made gain-of-function “virus” kills off senior Americans on Social Security in a targeted fashion. Adults over the age of 65 represent 16% of the population but 80% of the Covid-19 deaths. As of October 20, 2021 an estimated 549,716 Americans over age 65 have prematurely died due to Covid-19.
A half million Americans on Social Security who die five years early due to Covid-19 saves Social Security $48.5 billion. The timing is uncanny. Was this all pre-planned? Has the federal government figured out a murderous way to balance the Social Security budget? Nobody is going to raise their hands up in the air and confess to this.
Inexplicably, the first SARS virus (2002) disappeared. That is something viruses don’t normally do. Were heinous laboratory scientists perfecting SARS-2 CoV (Covid-19) then? Why did the director of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases deny his agency funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China?
A half million Americans on Social Security who die five years early due to Covid-19 saves Social Security $48.5 billion. Was this all pre-planned?
Then came unexpected longevity
To make matters worse, retirees began living longer. In 1935 when Social Security began, people who reached 65 years of age could expect to live an additional 12.5 years. Currently, women aged 65 can expect to live another 21.5 years; men another 19 or more years.
Today fewer people smoke tobacco, which takes ten years off of a typical smoker’s lifespan. I always wondered why the FDA allowed tobacco companies to sell their cigarettes unchallenged. Then it struck me, government doesn’t want people living longer. Not having to pay another ten years of Social Security checks was incentive enough for government to do little to halt smoking.
Americans must die on time so America can avoid insolvency
In recent times US Presidents hired ethicists to urge we die on time rather than prolong the miseries of old age. The nation cannot afford longevity.
Now for digital currency
There are plans underway to ditch paper dollar bills and bring in digital dollars (Dig$$). Digital currency isn’t just electronic money that people access via a plastic card. It replaces paper money and therefore there are no private transactions between parties. Categorically digital money is an intrusion of privacy.
Digital dollars will be issued by the federal government
Digital $$ (Dig$$) would be distributed directly from the US Treasury Department to the masses, much like the unemployment checks have been distributed during the Covid-19 lockdown. These federal government-issued electronic dollars are believed to be a forerunner of the guaranteed minimum income, or universal basic income, now under consideration.
With robots anticipated to replace workers and jobs vanishing, it appears a large portion of the working age population may be on the government dole. That is, unless they die off early from an infectious disease (?). Is the Covid-19 pandemic going to continue until a certain number of retirees have been culled from the population?
Giving government a view of everything a person buys could be used to control the population. For example, contributions to church may be classified as a donation to a racist organization and denied; or the purchase of a gasoline-powered car over an electric-powered vehicle might be rejected for reasons of air pollution and climate change.
Ford Motor Co. must know something, it is converting over to production of electric-powered vehicles. This change won’t be because of consumer demand for these electric-motored vehicles, it will be because Americans will be coerced to buy them. Government could socially control purchasing decisions, supposedly for the common good. Digital money = social control.
Why digital currency?
Governments would benefit from digital currency because more taxable transactions are recorded. The current Secretary of the Treasury says she wants to collect $7 trillion more in tax revenues by leaning on banks to report any transaction over $600. That is a giant wealth extraction, from private to public control. A switch from paper to digital currency could accomplish the same thing. No unreportable income.
Who benefits from digital currency?
Banks would primarily benefit from digital currency and are more competitive if they don’t have to deal with coins and cash, and therefore there would be no ATM machines, nor even branch banks. An estimated 300,000 bank tellers would be out of work.
The current banking marketplace now includes financial entities like Pay Pal that essentially are banks without brick-and-mortar branches and ATM machines. Facebook wants to issue its own money (Libras), and be its own central bank within a country.
These electronic banks don’t have the overhead of the traditional banks (Citibank, B of A, Chase, US Bank, Wells Fargo, Capital One, Citizens Bank, etc.), and can out-compete them. Dig$$ would eliminate the need for paper money and all banks could compete on an equal playing field. Digital money and banking reform benefits bankers and government, not the public.
But wait. Can everyone participate in digital currency?
There are impediments to universal Dig$$ participation. There are 1.2 billion people in a world of 7.9 billion population who are unbanked. Then there are another 773 million illiterate adults in the world. God only knows if these people can convert from paper money to digital. How would these people survive without a linkage to money? Paper money is simple to use and doesn’t require electronic devices, nor a high IQ.
It is presumed incentives will be given to convert from paper money to the Dig$$. But would financial incentives to adopt Dig$$ be able to sway the illiterate and the unbanked?
Banking as usual (not!)
When one reads the Bank of International Settlements guide on how central and commercial banks can convert to Dig$$, you would think nothing is amiss in the world of banking today, that everything is rosy, and digital dollars are a logical evolution in a world that demands ultra-fast payments.
But banking is not as usual. Furthermore, no mention is made in the BIS report of a globalist takeover of the world with control of digital money as its core coercive machinery.
The Dig$$ guidebook
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS), headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, has issued its report how to integrate digital currencies into Central Banks and then to 2nd tier commercial and community banks.
The BIS is owned by 63 central banks doing business in countries around the world, and is therefore the bank for central banks that guides policies and promotes central bank stability.
Enter the Bank of International Settlements
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS), has long been an advocate for adequate reserves held by banks (traditionally 10%) to stabilize banking throughout the world.
However, the BIS has ended up being feckless as too-big-to-fail banks were able to push those reserve requirements into the future to the point where now, due to the COVID-19 crisis, there are no traditional 10% reserves held by banks in the US today!
Should a bank run begin, there are no reserves. The public is set up to lose most of its money as the Federal Deposit Insurance Co. (FDIC) can only insure 1.7-cents of every dollar in the bank.
The BIS report does express concern that digitalization could create financial exclusion issues which could result in what it calls a digital divide. People who aren’t digitally savvy may be pushed out of the financial equation altogether (the aforementioned illiterates and unbanked).
What about privacy?
The BIS report gives lip service to issues of banking privacy, but more so in terms of preventing electronic terrorism or cyber theft, never alluding to the fact that the biggest fraudster, invader of privacy and eroder of personal wealth is the federal government and the central bank itself via inflation. The BIS report concedes Dig$$ is primarily “a means of payment rather than a store of value.”
The BIS report states: “Privacy is an acknowledged fundamental human right in most international instruments, such as the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.”
Privacy is one thing, but security is another. What good would it be to appeal to a World Court after everybody lost their money?
The BIS report does indicate issues of privacy are the most important aspect of digital banking. The BIS report demands security features for Dig$$ to prevent illicit activities on one hand, and bank runs on the other hand. But what about consumer protection from the fiat-based banking system itself? It is a system of faith, a religion you might say.
Bankers want to destroy paper dollars that are backed by “full faith and credit of the United States” so as to coerce Americans to accept digital currency, and then restore that “full faith and credit” in digital dollars. Will they pull it off?
Imposed limits on withdrawals
In the US, there are already daily limits on how much can be withdrawn from ATM machines. The central Federal Reserve bank says you cannot make more than six withdrawals or transfers from your savings account per month. Banks use their depositors’ money as reserves (but as mentioned earlier, that requirement that has now been cancelled).
How to get the public to buy into Dig$$
The BIS report nonsensically states: “merchants would only accept DIG$$ if there were sufficient consumers who want to use it.” I’ve not bumped into anyone who wants to use Dig$$. It appears it Dig$$ is going to be forced on the public. Banking will be on bankers’ terms, not the public’s terms.
Banks and government have much to gain and all to lose in their current efforts to meld with the Central Bank’s digital money scheme.
The BIS report goes on to say how Americans are going to be softened up to accept the new digital currency:
“Consumers who receive payments in Dig$$ may be more likely to use Dig$$. Public authorities might therefore be able to incentivize consumer use of Dig$$ by disbursing social benefits and transfers to individuals in Dig$$ and allowing employees to receive their salaries in Dig$$. Allowing consumers to pay their taxes in Dig$$ may also provide a stable, concrete example for consumers to use Dig$$.”
What about Bitcoin?
Regarding Bitcoin which the BIS report refers to as Stablecoins, the BIS report states: “…Central bankers will need to satisfy regulators that they are safe.”
What a joke. Bitcoin users by definition don’t want to be part of the collapsing currency system that allows banks to make money off of other people’s money while offering next-to-zero interest. In a worldwide bank run, Stablecoins remain valuable.
Converting paper money to digital money
The BIS report makes no mention how paper money would be returned to the US Treasury Department in exchange for the Dig$$. Would that conversion accept paper dollars on a dollar-per-dollar basis, or would the conversion be 70% of its face value, another way central banks and governments can short-change citizens and balance the US budget on the backs of cash hoarders. Expect issuance of an expiration date on US paper dollars with the introduction of Dig$$. Those paper dollars you have hidden under the mattress will become worthless after that expiration date.
The BIS report mentions the prospect of dealing with massive simultaneous banks runs, which could be nationwide or even worldwide. But in the current economic climate, a stock market collapse and a massive bank run looms.
In a digital banking system there is no way for consumers to get their money out of the system other than converting it to something tangible, like buying cans of coffee or bags of rice.
Discussion of bank runs in the BIS report is of useless value. Even though savers who use remote devices don’t have to drive down to a local bank ATM machine in an attempt to take their money out of the bank, should a bank run occur, there is no paper money to withdraw. Digital dollars keep all money in the system and eliminates bank runs. Who are they fooling?
About the claim digital money would give the poor greater access to borrowed money
An attempt is made to convince the public that Dig$$ would provide more people on the planet with access to capital (borrowed money). But the real problem is not access, it is onerous and predatory interest rates imposed upon the people who need it the most, the poor. Dig$$ doesn’t fix this.
The issue of usury, onerous interest rates on credit cards, is a topic the banking industry won’t discuss. The median interest rate on credit cards is reportedly 21% and as high as 35%. Banks can access money at ~1%. News caster Tucker Carlson brought this subject up on television. A proposed 14% cap on credit card interest was rejected.
Stop playing around with the people’s money
What can be done to save the American economy and retain the accumulated wealth of Americans. Here are some ideas:
Halt the effort to eliminate paper money and thus preserve the freedoms inherent in a free society
Back the currency with something tangible in order to slow or eliminate inflation; increase the value not the volume of money.
Stop the usury (onerous interest rates) on borrowed money
Cease the practice of banks issuing dividends to stockholders when bank depositors receive next to nothing.
Cease borrowing from our future and spending more money than the nation takes in in taxes.
Replace lottery ticket machines with convenient locally-placed silver coin dispensers. The purchase of silver coins over time would allow the poor to amass wealth, if for no other reason than increased demand for silver resulting in a rise in the price of silver. The practice of buying a silver coin every week for 40 years would amass 1,920 silver coins X an estimated $100-200 value per coin = $192,000-384,000, which would retain its purchasing power. I can assure you very, very few lottery players make out that well buying lottery tickets. Currently the federal government is funneling all the money to the top 1%. A silver money revolution would funnel wealth to the bottom. The bottom-income earners could do this on their own, but it has to be as convenient and available as lottery tickets.
Stop creating stock market and real estate bubbles with cheap money. Increase the base interest rate for money from the nation’s central bank which then raises interest rates at the consumer level to buy homes and automobiles. Americans would go back to saving money to make a 20% down payment before buying a home. This would increase the interest paid on saved money. Americans once earned 5% interest on their banked money. However, the downside is that this would raise the interest rate paid on the nation’s $28 trillion National Debt. To deal with this, implement the next suggestion.
Pay down the federal debt of $28 trillion by selling off a portion of the $200 trillion of US assets, and save $300-billion of interest.
A problem this author has with this topic is that nobody else appears to provide critical analysis. Trillions of dollars wealth are covertly being stolen from Americans’ pocketbooks via inflation, and talk about digital money is narrowly confined to technical or trivial aspects of this major change in currency and banking. Is the federal government going to pull the wool over the eyes of the entire population?
Where are you Neil Cavuto, Suze Orman, Dave Ramsey, Jim Cramer, and a host of other financial commentators who have turned financial reporting into entertainment rather than serious public discussion?
The globalists talk about the Great Reset, that everyone will rent rather than own homes, automobiles, even lawn mowers and vacuum cleaners, and be happier for it. But then there will be no individual wealth. The greater question is, are we renting money from the government, or is it our money?
In a House hearing on Thursday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) questioned AG Merrick Garland about a mysterious man, Ray Epps, instructing protesters to enter the US Capitol building on January 5, and who later shepherded crowds towards the Capitol on January 6.
The story of the mystery man, Ray Epps, featured in Rep. Massie’s video above is in fact far more shocking than even the good Congressman implies in the hearing. It’s a story so strange, and so scandalous at every turn, that it threatens to shatter the entire official narrative of the “Capitol Breach” and expose yet another dimension of proactive federal involvement in the so-called “insurrection” of January 6th.
If Revolver News’s previous reporting points to a proactive role of the federal government in relation to the conspiracy cases against Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, the Ray Epps story that follows suggests a similar, yet more egregious, explicit, direct and immediate degree of federal involvement in the breach of the Capitol itself.
Here is a transcript of Thomas Massie’s exchange with the Attorney General, just in case you skipped past the video above.
Rep. Massie: As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he’ll probably go to jail, he’ll probably be arrested, but they need to go into the Capitol the next day, is then directing people into the Capitol the next day, is then the next day directing people to the Capitol. And as far as we can find. You said this is one of the most sweeping in history. Have you seen that video, or those frames from that video?
AG Garland: So as I said at the outset, one of the norms of the Justice Department is to not comment on pending investigations, and particularly not to comment on particular scenes or particular individuals.
Rep. Massie: I was hoping today to give you an opportunity to put to rest the concerns that people have that there were federal agents or assets of the federal government present on January 5 and January 6. Can you tell us, without talking about particular incidents or particular videos, how many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6, whether they agitated to go into the Capitol, and if any of them did?
AG Garland: So I’m not going to violate this norm of, uh, of, of, of, the rule of law.
[Looks down and away]
I’m not going to comment on an investigation that’s ongoing.
There is good reason why AG Garland ran from Massie’s question faster than he could find words — and why he couldn’t even keep eye contact as he was dodging Massie’s gaze.
After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol.
Secondly, Revolver also determined, and will prove below, that the the FBI stealthily removed Ray Epps from its Capitol Violence Most Wanted List on July 1, just one day after Revolver exposed the inexplicable and puzzlesome FBI protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. July 1 was also just one day after separate New York Times report amplified a glaring, falsifiable lie about Epps’s role in the events of January 6.
Lastly, Ray Epps appears to have worked alongside several individuals — many of them suspiciously unindicted — to carry out a breach of the police barricades that induced a subsequent flood of unsuspecting MAGA protesters to unwittingly trespass on Capitol restricted grounds and place themselves in legal jeopardy.
The Republic of Texas is militarily in a continuing war crime illegally occupied, has been for 156 years.
Texicans are not allowed to have their own government, courts, peace officers or military.
A-BUTT is the occupation Guvnor administrating the occupation for the USA/DC Corporation squatting in Sodom and Gomorrah on the Potomac.
Cousin American general George S Patton murdered by USA/DC for not betraying America to red Russian Communism said:
“Fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man.”
George S Patton.
Building a wall which can be cut through, tunneled under, gone over is the hight of stupidity while promising the illegal criminals cradle to the grave “FREE EVERYTHING” once they go through over or under said wall.
Nighty days of hard labor on a chain gang with an assured trip back across the Rio Grande would be a much better deterrent.
Second criminal trespass on Texas soil, 180 days of hard labor on a chain gang.
Want to go for 360 days on a hard assed labor chain gang?
The Ole Dog!
EAGLE PASS, Texas — Texas Army National Guard troops and equipment deployed by Governor Greg Abbott moved in to block a portion of the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas. The troops began arriving on Friday and positioned themselves along a one-mile stretch of the river near the downtown area of the city.
The troops are stationed in Humvee vehicles carefully placed along the riverbank to serve as a deterrent to illegal crossings near the city. Nearly 30 vehicles are parked less than 150 feet from each other facing Mexico. Border Patrol agents in the area tell Breitbart Texas that more troops were scheduled to arrive later in the day.
As reported by Breitbart Texas, the area surrounding the ports of entry in Eagle Pass are known as high traffic areas for illegal crossings and are problematic for the Border Patrol due to the proximity to private residences in the city. Although many migrants choose to surrender hoping for quick release into the United States, many others, usually single adults, attempt to elude apprehension. Deterring migrants from crossing in the area prevents a quick escape into the populated areas within the city.
Governor Abbott utilized a similar tactic during the Haitian migrant crisis in Del Rio in September. Texas Highway Patrol troopers strategically placed vehicles along the river bank to prevent additional migrants from reaching the camp near a common crossing point in the area.
During the late War Crimes Illegal Invasion of the South by the witch burning and little Southern children Gang Raping till death yankee puritan USA terrorist, the head terrorist, the closet queer atheist lying mentally unstable manic depressive shyster rail road lawyer sack of pig s#it war criminal Lincoln asked Scoot his head War Criminal general why Scott had been able to take Mexico City in days, but months had passed and still Scott had not been able to take Richmond Virginia, the capital of the Confederacy.
The war criminal yankee general replied:
“Because the boys who took Mexico City are defending Richmond”.
Get the damn yankee carpetbaggers the hell out of Texas, Texicans would put the stop to this s#it right away.
Even if it meant taking Mexico City again!
The Ole Texican Dog!
The situation along the U.S.-Mexico border along portions of Texas are deteriorating into “a firing war” as brazen drug cartel militants have started shooting across the border into the United States into areas where National Guard forces and law enforcement personnel are stationed, according to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.
The troops and law enforcement personnel were ordered into position by Abbott to staunch the flow of illegal immigrants into the state because the Biden regime refuses to do so, but they have been increasingly targeted by cartel militants who have been emboldened by the lack of response from the administration.
In a recent interview on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, Abbott said Americans in Texas, a red state, have been “abandoned” by the regime in D.C.
“I have to tell you there’s something that’s happening that’s getting even worse and that’s the cartels are getting even more aggressive and the cartels on the Mexican side of the border, they’re beginning to open fire on the National Guard that Texas has down on the border to secure the border,” Abbott said.
“This is escalating into a firing war on each side of the border where Texas and our National Guard are having to defend themselves and defend the state of Texas,” he added.
Most of the attention in Texas recently has been focused on the Del Rio area because a large group of Haitian migrants crossed illegally and set up a tent city underneath a bridge near the city. But about 60 miles south of that location, cartels are waging an undeclared war on the United States, in essence.
“Right now the hottest point is in Roma, Texas,” Abbott said. “That’s the area where the cartels on the Mexican side of the border are shooting at the National Guard on the Texas side of the border.
“And so what Texas is having to do, we’re having to step up and guard multiple points across the entire border,” he added.
On October 8, Fox News released video footage of suspected cartel members firing multiple rounds across the border into the United States. National Guard troops have reported several incidents of cartel members standing across the Rio Grande River and taunting them.
Meanwhile, President Joe Biden’s “border czar,” Vice President Kamala Harris, is producing cringe-worthy videos for NASA, visiting Lake Mead in Nevada to discuss climate change, and stumping for her Democrat colleague Terry McAuliffe in the Virginia governor race.
Many South Texas residents have traditionally voted for Democrats, but last year, a substantial number of them cast a ballot instead for then-President Donald Trump because he exercised his authority as president and commander-in-chief and enforced allborder laws, while making arrangements with Mexico and Central America to substantially reduce illegal immigrant traffic.
“The Biden administration has completely abandoned all the people who live on the border, and they’ve abandoned people in the state of Texas,” Abbott said. “These are counties and these are people who traditionally have voted Democrat that the Biden administration is ignoring, and he’s putting them in danger.”
In late September Laredo, Texas, Mayor Pete Saenz, who is a Democrat, lauded Trump and said the Biden regime had to step up and do its job of securing America.
Texas [The illegal corporation, not the Occupied Republic of Texas] has long been a red state and our real [CEO of the USA/DC Corporation of which ‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’ CORPORATION is a sub corporation of] president, Donald Trump, won the state again in 2020, but the problem is, GOP margins of victory, including Trump’s, have been shrinking over successive election cycles.
For example, in 2000, then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush
won his state by nearly 22 points; however, last fall, Trump only won the state by about 5.5 points, and that’s after he won Texas in 2016 by 9 points over Hillary Clinton.
So clearly, the state of Texas is becoming less red, and that is a problem because if Texas ever turns blue, then between California, New York, and the Lone Star State, there will never be another conservative, constitutionalist president like Trump
again for the foreseeable future. And the Democrats know that; they’ve been concentrating on turning Texas blue for a decade.
That process has been helped, in no small part, by Texas Republicans, including Gov. Greg Abbott:
He has been advertising his state to residents of California and other blue enclaves as a free, liberty-minded alternative to the Nazi-like authoritarianism, high prices and high regulations.
Is Abbott importing blue voters from blue states? And is he inviting his own demise? He’s beginning a process to find out.
According to multiple reports, Abbott has ordered an audit of 2020 ballots in the state’s most populous (and blue, or trending blue) counties. CBS News provided some details:
The audited counties will include the major Democratic strongholds around Houston and Dallas, as well as Tarrant County, which for years has been the largest GOP-controlled county in Texas but went for President Biden last year.
“Under existing Texas laws, the Secretary of State has the authority to conduct a full and comprehensive forensic audit of any election and has already begun the process in Texas’ two largest Democrat counties and two largest Republican counties,” a statement from Keith Ingram, the office’s elections administrator, read.
There are audits of every aspect of government,” Abbott said. “We have a state auditor, there’s a federal auditor for the way the government operations work. Businesses that are public companies are subject to an annual audit. Why do we audit everything in this world, but people raise their hands in concern when we audit elections, which are fundamental to our democracy?”
Interestingly, several Texas judges — who are supposed to be apolitical — voiced their opinions about Abbott’s audit.
The Lone Star State is in chaos after Gov. Greg Abbott issued an executive order banning all entities from demanding proof of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination.”
Since many Texans were already fired or forced to resign from their jobs months ago due to Chinese Virus injection mandates, many of them are now demanding that they be re-hired due to Abbott’s order.
“Gov. Abbott says very clearly, ‘whereas countless Texans fear losing their livelihoods because they object to receiving a Covid-19 vaccination for reasons of personal conscience,’” stated Attorney Jared Woodfill, who represents some 200 health care workers who have filed multiple lawsuits against Houston Methodist Hospital.
“That applies to every plaintiff that I represent, and every plaintiff that Methodist hospital thought it was appropriate to fire.”
Woodfill is planning to send a formal request to Houston Methodist that aims to reinstate every employee who was force to leave the facility due to its demand that they get injected with an “Operation Warp Speed” needle in order to keep their jobs.
Houston Methodist, by the way, which resides in a “red” state, was the first hospital system in the country to require that its employees take one of the “vaccines” brought into existence at “warp speed” by Donald Trump.
Of the 25,000 people who are employed at Houston Methodist, a paltry 178 were suspended for declining the jabs. Another 153 also voluntarily resigned or were fired due to wanting to keep their DNA and immune systems intact.
Houston Methodist, Baylor, IBM, Southwest and American all planning to defy Abbott’s executive order